Predicting UK Future Residential Bandwidth Requirements

Download full text

We wrote to the Broadband Stakeholder Group responding to their Green Paper on their predictions for the future broadband requirements for homes and businesses.

The Green Paper raises the prospect of another urban/rural digital divide opening, with potentially serious problems for rural economies and communities.

Our report 'Beyond Digital Divides: The Future of ICT in Rural Areas', published last year, showed that while access to broadband services in rural areas was improving, vigilance was still needed to ensure a divide does not open again as future generations of faster broadband are developed.

The report found that some differences in broadband services for urban and rural areas are starting to emerge. Already some urban areas have access to much greater bandwidth (up to 8 Megabits per second), compared with basic broadband (up to 512 Kilobits per second) in rural areas.

Access to faster broadband services can bring great opportunities for rural people, where technology removes problems of distance and isolation, and helps rural businesses be more competitive.

The importance of access to ICT in rural areas was highlighted in our recently published report 'Rural Disadvantage: Priorities for action'. The study sets out the main findings from our evidence review of rural disadvantage and highlights priorities for action for policy makers.

via Broadband and ICT Digital Inclusion

Comments

1
Looks like nobody took any notice of your report, because the divide looms ever larger in 2009. 21Cn network will make high speed access available near the exchange, but further reduce the distance it can travel, making more people drop off the end of the line. The only way to sort the issue is to deploy fibre in rural areas which will force the incumbent to upgrade their infrastructure and deliver 20th century broadband to the people, not some patched up obsolete copper solution.
Posted by chris doyle  at 3:58pm on Monday, 23rd March 2009
2
If you want people to post you should take off the moderation - you can always delete spam afterwards.
Posted by chris doyle  at 3:59pm on Monday, 23rd March 2009
3
Thanks for your comments Chris.
Unfortunately we had to introduce pre-moderation due to very, very high levels of spam, including from registered site users. It's not ideal, but due to the very offensive nature of some the spam posts, we had to take the difficult decision to moderate all comments.

Since we published our Digital Divides report in 2005, broadband speeds have risen hugely, and the division between rural and urban access has increased. There's now an opportunity for us and others to try and influence the final Digital Britain report, to help ensure that it's recommendations can deliver an effective network suitable for all areas, urban and rural.
Posted by  at 4:13pm on Monday, 23rd March 2009
4
Did you publish a response to the digital britain interim report?
Posted by chris doyle  at 7:35am on Tuesday, 24th March 2009
5

During the response period Stuart Burgess, our chair and the Government's Rural Advocate, spoke to Lord Carter and as a result we've been asked to produce a report for him focussing on the issues faced by rural mobile and internet users. This report will provide us with the opportunity to respond to the Digital Britain report in depth.


Lord Carter also committed to try and attend our Rural Experience visit focusing on digital inclusion, to see first-hand some of the technological difficulties encountered by rural businesses and communities.

Posted by  at 10:35am on Tuesday, 24th March 2009
6
I think it is a shame that the iner cities cannot subsidise the connections of those living further away from the exchange. The days of waiting for enough people in you area to want broadband are suppose to be over, however i can't see any companies digging up roads to get to remote properties like farms without charging the earth.

Mobile broadband offers some hope i suppose and maybe as that gets faster more peoples needs are met.  There are alternitives, as a WISP (wireless internet provider ie not 3g but proper speeds that can be faster than adsl if you are willing to pay for it) i find it frustrating that the big adsl companies can advertise the 'free' services they do when if you live in a bundled area you have to pay and if you live to far from the exchange you get a rubish connection anyway.

For those in the south east attend 2 may well be able to service your needs as we don't use the phone or cable network.  But there are other comapnies that offer a similar service accross the uk, failing that satalitle broadband although slower and more expensive is still a viable solution in some cases.
Posted by  at 8:24am on Thursday, 28th May 2009

What do you think?

You are now commenting anonymously. LOGIN to add comments attributed to you.


Please note: User comments will only appear on the site after they have been moderated and approved by CRC.